Group Video Project
- Can AI Replace Tutors? -- General Audience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jx7sTidBF9w
- Can AI Replace Tutors? -- Professional Audience. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AMS4kjELDWg
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Video Peer-Review -- General Audience:
Video Peer-Review -- General Audience:
Autonomous Weapons and the Ethics of Killing by Algorithm (2025). https://youtu.be/jWQoO-hBeQc
Review: The topic was covered well, and briefly touched on some of the issues behind autonomous weapons and human intervention. The quality of the video was well put together with video clips for visuals and informative text. Overall, very engaging and carries the viewer along with cute and light music. I'm not entirely sure I would know, if I weren't an active student who understood this was a group assignment, that it was a joint team effort until the end, when "Group 8" was displayed, suggesting that the video likely was made by a group. Some of the information uses advanced vocabulary, which may be familiar to some viewers in the general audience, but not all.
Suggestion: I recommend using a voice-over, if no changes are wanted to be made to the video, to build on some of the information given in text for users unfamiliar with the mentioned concepts or terminology. If there is a desire to avoid voice-overs altogether, the text could include a follow-up explanation or expansion on some of the points made, such as "Categorical ban or regulatory approach" is not middle-school friendly in that they won't understand what the presenter means by "Categorical ban" or what would be considered "regulatory approach."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Review: The topic was covered well, and briefly touched on some of the issues behind autonomous weapons and human intervention. The quality of the video was well put together with video clips for visuals and informative text. Overall, very engaging and carries the viewer along with cute and light music. I'm not entirely sure I would know, if I weren't an active student who understood this was a group assignment, that it was a joint team effort until the end, when "Group 8" was displayed, suggesting that the video likely was made by a group. Some of the information uses advanced vocabulary, which may be familiar to some viewers in the general audience, but not all.
Suggestion: I recommend using a voice-over, if no changes are wanted to be made to the video, to build on some of the information given in text for users unfamiliar with the mentioned concepts or terminology. If there is a desire to avoid voice-overs altogether, the text could include a follow-up explanation or expansion on some of the points made, such as "Categorical ban or regulatory approach" is not middle-school friendly in that they won't understand what the presenter means by "Categorical ban" or what would be considered "regulatory approach."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delivery Drones (2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DTrd9qXZAWg
Review: The topic of delivery drones was beautifully presented with high quality audio and spokesmanship (though, now that I've discovered AI is being used for voiceovers, if this is not the natural speaker, the following review holds true). Absolutely loved this presentation! It presented a very clear objective and gave appropriate detail with engaging video clips that aligned well with the speech. Very approriate for the general audience. Introduces the group at the beginning of slides, indicating a joint effort.
Review: The topic of delivery drones was beautifully presented with high quality audio and spokesmanship (though, now that I've discovered AI is being used for voiceovers, if this is not the natural speaker, the following review holds true). Absolutely loved this presentation! It presented a very clear objective and gave appropriate detail with engaging video clips that aligned well with the speech. Very approriate for the general audience. Introduces the group at the beginning of slides, indicating a joint effort.
Suggestion: I really can't suggest anything that would make this better. Beautifuuly done. If AI was used, I still find it should be acceptable for a general audience video!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------Digital Detox (2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XMY_ZBHa6Ic
Review: Very unique approach and I will say that I absolutely love this method for a general audience video. This is very authentic, honest, and infomative from a more personal stand point. It introduces the topic of digital detox, what it is and why it's important, in a peer-interview presentation. This is a fantastic display of team work as it examples the contribution of the team beyond just stating names of the author in text. The research is very narrowed to personal experiences, but applies some research about digital detox, for which they applied to their speech, using Q & A method. Very appropriate for the general audience for it's introductory discussion, friendly terminology, and presentation style.
Suggestion: I'm unsure if this is even anything the general audience would care for, but the only recommendation I have would be to remove the recording studio from the first presenter's video. It just makes the video feel drafted a little.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Video Peer-Review -- Professional Audience:Unplugged: The Digital Detox Culture in the Tech Industry (2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8C24i5uP98k
Review: Very cute and clean video with light music complimenting the flow of the speech. Clearly discusses the overwhelm that is associated with the industry, as far as fatigue, poor posture, and eye strain. Supportive imagery that aligns with the speech and beautifully represents the topic with sufficient information and fluid transitions throughout the video. I'm not entirely sure if I'm qualified to judge professionalism, as this video, from my limited experience, is well done! However, like many of the other videos, it uses AI and I don't really have input on the presentation power of the presenters, so perhaps for a general audience, this video would be more fitting.
Suggestion: I don't have to many suggestions that I can really give other than that, since it is intended for professionals, it might be more advantageous for the presenters to share this information with a little more data, terminology, and include authentic voice overs.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Autonomous Weapons and the Ethics of Killing by Algorithm (2025). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdkkDc02Ktk
Review: Well structured, clear agenda and objective. Voice over is slightly theatrical, which contributes to the intensity of the topic itself. Vocabulary is advanced and certainly meets professional standards, with ample information build upon the texts within the presentation. Authors team members to illustrate team effort, and uses supportive visual aids that engages with the view. I love this presentation, but I have been battling its approriateness for professionals, as it still appears somewhat geared toward the general audience in style, but professional in context.
Review: Well structured, clear agenda and objective. Voice over is slightly theatrical, which contributes to the intensity of the topic itself. Vocabulary is advanced and certainly meets professional standards, with ample information build upon the texts within the presentation. Authors team members to illustrate team effort, and uses supportive visual aids that engages with the view. I love this presentation, but I have been battling its approriateness for professionals, as it still appears somewhat geared toward the general audience in style, but professional in context.
Suggestion: As I was in conflict with myself regarding the targetted audience, I don't know if my suggestions would be beneficial. However, I would recommend one or two revisions: Remove lower quality or uneccesary visual aids and replace them with still images that bullets some of the key points currently being discussed, and if using AI or changing the presenter's natural voice, replace the audio with the presenters' natural voice.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reflection
This week challenged us to meet multiple deadlines throughout the project and I was fortunate to be introduces to productivity tools that my teammates have used to support the development of our project. Everyone pulled through temendously and the entire final piece came together smoothly. I don't think I'll be using Canva for power point editing, however. We did utilize this platform and were pleasantly surprised by a lot of its features. Some areas in Canva could benefit from some additional features that other editors offer, however, the real issue lies in its bugginess. The interactions are inconsistent between the members working on that particular piece, more so within the editing features. This was a learning experience for all of us, but even with this set back, we were able to pull together to resolve the matter.
Reflection
This week challenged us to meet multiple deadlines throughout the project and I was fortunate to be introduces to productivity tools that my teammates have used to support the development of our project. Everyone pulled through temendously and the entire final piece came together smoothly. I don't think I'll be using Canva for power point editing, however. We did utilize this platform and were pleasantly surprised by a lot of its features. Some areas in Canva could benefit from some additional features that other editors offer, however, the real issue lies in its bugginess. The interactions are inconsistent between the members working on that particular piece, more so within the editing features. This was a learning experience for all of us, but even with this set back, we were able to pull together to resolve the matter.
No comments:
Post a Comment